1. Almost no one knows what is going on in the multi-events.
This often includes commentators.
2. Where someone is in the “standings” after 2, 3 or even 7 events is typically meaningless since different athletes excel in different events.
While one athlete might always have a strong first day, another might be stronger on day two. This is very difficult for people to understand, and often even difficult for family members of multi-eventers to understand. This point is well illustrated by considering the Decathlon held at the 2019 World Championships: the eventual winner, Niklas Kaul, was 20th after 1 event, 11th after 6 events, and 6th with just two events to go. If you didn’t know better, you’d think this was a comeback for the ages. However, this was not a case of Kaul putting in extraordinary performances right at the end, it just so happened that his two best events come 9th and 10th.
3. The only time anyone really understands what is going in the multi-events is during or after the last event.
Even then, it was only recently that World Athletics introduced a live predicted finish graphic that showed people where athletes would finish in real time, given how fast they were running in the 800m/1500m. Needless to say, the implementation of this graphic made things far more exciting and informative for viewers and commentators alike: they could see who was winning the whole event in real time.